
As we conclude another tumultuous year, it’s imperative to pause and consider the significant congressional and regulatory activities that have reshaped our national landscape. These developments carry lasting implications for our communities, industries, and civic institutions. Here’s why we should all be concerned:
Banking and Financial Regulations
May and June saw Congress repealing the Biden-era bank merger review rules via the Congressional Review Act, barring similar future rules. This shift in policy, compounded by the OCC’s October decision to simplify rules for banks with less than $30 billion in assets, weakens the involvement of community voices and eases the path for bank mergers. These decisions prioritize industry convenience over consumer protection and community wellbeing. Furthermore, the suspension of fair lending exams until 2026 threatens to dilute accountability in the finance sector.
Community and Economic Impact
The financial sector isn’t the only area under threat. This March, an executive order aimed to dismantle the Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Fund, with further blows dealt by administrative funding freezes and directives undermining diversity in economic inclusion initiatives. With Treasury’s draft guidance removing DEI as a permissible use of CDFI funds and delayed funding for 2025, community progress hangs in the balance. These actions stall efforts to bridge economic gaps and support underserved communities.
Housing and Fair Lending
The erosion of fair housing initiatives is alarming. HUD’s abandonment of the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) rule and attempts in February and March to reduce fair housing program capacities, although partly reversed by the courts, are worrying steps backward in the fight for equitable housing. Efforts by the FHFA to cease support for Special Purpose Credit Programs (SPCP) further expose vulnerable communities to housing insecurity.
Consumer Rights and Transparency
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) December crisis potentially imploding the bureau itself signals a danger to consumer rights. November’s proposal to scale back disparate impact rules, discouragement liability, and SPCP limits further erodes protections meant to safeguard fair practices. The Department of Justice’s removal of disparate impact rules for federal grantees exacerbates these vulnerabilities, creating an environment ripe for discrimination.
Executive Overreach and the Nonprofit Sector
This year has shown an alarming expansion of executive power, diminishing the autonomy of independent agencies, and exacerbating pressures on the nonprofit sector through a chilling effect and destabilization. The cumulative weight of these legislative changes places immense strain on organizations striving for social equity, transparency, and community empowerment.
Conclusion
We face an uncertain future, where the foundational principles of fairness, equity, and transparency are increasingly questioned. As constituents and community members, it’s imperative to remain engaged, leveraging our voices to challenge these shifts and advocate for policies that foster inclusive progress. Let us work collectively towards a future that upholds the values of justice, opportunity, and sustainability.